On the Matter of Masculine and Feminine Energy


With the background in buddhism, Traditional Chinese Medicine and Taoism I naturally seek to internally explain outer circumstances and events to myself. The Yin and Yang theory provides a natural and simple model for this because… it’s natural. Resting on this, I hold that for instance the current mainstream politics and relations between men and women are out of balance. 

The Masters of Energy, the Taoists, and he classic Taoist philosophy, states that men and women have energetic sexual differences. The Taoists believe that after a woman fully activates her female yin energy and a man fully activates his male yang energy, then and only then is it possible for men and women to completely appreciate and embody their opposite energy within themselves, So in Taoist thought, the primary functions of yin and yang energy differ. Yang energy characteristically tends to go in an outward direction, like fire or a beam of light. The opposite is true for yin energy, which characteristically tends to flow inward, to absorb, like earth and water. Yin energy wants to allow something to come into it, to let that something manifest and emerge, become nourished, and grow. Whereas the creative outflowing yang energy does not mind destruction, the inflowing yin energy loves growth and loathes destruction.

Taoist thought holds that a woman’s heart center, or middle tantien, is naturally more alive and activated than man’s. Correspondingly, a man’s lower tantien is naturally more activated than a woman’s. The heart center is ruler of human emotions and the lower tantien governs physicality.

So, what do I make of these basic truths?

Well, it’s not far fetched to see why there is so many divorces. The ordinary man of today is not as masculine, and the ordinary woman is not as feminine, as former generations. When both looses their clear differences in energy, men drops in yang and therefore yin rises and women drops in yin and therefor yang rises, the polarity between them decreases. In the interplay between them, nothing happens. There’s no charge, because the plusses and minuses respectively, has lost their strength.

Neither sex wants this, no matter what the feminists states. Women want their men to be masculine and men want their women feminine. When this is out of balance, contempt starts to grow in both. Men don’t want an aggressive masculine woman and women don’t want these weak, undecisive, submitting yes sayers of todays’ manboys.
We need to find our true natural states of being once again. We are meant to stay together, not to divorce. We are meant to make children, but that numbers are dropping as we speak. In Sweden every woman give birth to an astonishing number of 1.1 children. Which leads to the second concern of mine.

More and more people starts to raise their eyes towards the current state in the West. All of a sudden Sweden, the beautiful oasis of law and order, of very high economic standards and several centuries of peace and quiet, is the runner up in the rape statistics in the world. Hard life time working Swedish people are set aside in housing, pensions, schooling, jobs… The (often so called) refugees are given way more benefits and money, from Swedish tax payers ofcourse, than Swedes. In virtually every county they are given the houses and apartments right in front of the noses of the Swedes that have been queing to get one for years or even decades. Hey, the Swedes even occupying these from the start, are being thrown out, even though they have made their payments in time since they started renting it. Because we need to take care of the “refugees” and be nice. We would be racists otherwise..! I could go on forever with totally ridiculous examples. This plays out in every level of society today. The special treatment, not for the natives, but the invaders. It’s a clear case of genocide, the replacment of a people in its own country, taking place. And I do not blame the invaders. Why would I? If we are so stupid to give away our resources and culture, we are the ones who is to be blamed. If we give, ofcourse they will gladly take it.

How. Is. This. Possible? Feminist. Liberal. Matriarchy. Woah, what am I saying!? Well, read above. Men become weaker in their energy, leading to women getting out of balance, leading to more women in leading positions and so forth. Remember the feminine energy? It “wants to allow something to come into it, to let that something manifest and emerge, become nourished, and grow”…

We need patriarchy. We need strong masculine men, and we need strong feminine women. To secure the ideal of the nuclear family, to secure our people. This is the natural way, the way of our people since forever, where men and women are strong in their natural energies. Where men and women uplift each other in their different ways of expressing, in their different roles, supporting and nurturing each other.

But I believe we’ve reached the point of no return. There will be major conflicts and economic and social breakdowns. Then only family and tribe matters.


FundaMENTAL knowledge on men and women


There’s significant differences between men and women, although the current paradigm of feminized society tells you another story. I will not go through the most apparent, the biology, but rather a few examples on how we interact, the mental stuff, how we percieve ourselves and the outer world differently.

Women as supply, men as demand

If she wants, he gets. That is the utter truth. Women has the power when it comes to sex. I’m obviously not counting in the violation of women through rape!
Some women and men are close friends, even when in relation with another man or woman. I do not judge anyone here, but be concious about the truth above. Men and women cannot ever be close friends and set aside the sexual aspect of it. Since all energy in its core are sexual, Yin meeting Yang, there will be sexual energy between them.

Women always try to mate with the alpha, or as high in the hierarchy as possible, gaining the most precious DNA as possible. Then they seek out a beta male to take care of her and her babies.
Men on the other hand are wired to spread their seed in the largest area of women as possible. They want to make sure their DNA passes on to the next round.

What does this mean in everyday life? Women tend to search for safety. They want to be taken care of, even the most out of balanced masculinized ones, feminists that is. So, in a relationship, it is common women also have male friends. If something goes wrong, i.e. the relationship ends, she has the backup in place. Or as it says in the Havamal: The heart of the woman is built on wheels.
Single men, being wired as mentioned above, therefor are waiting to take over the woman, if her relationship ends.

The social contract

Despite these primal energies of men and women, most of us in relationship, buy into the monogamy. It serves us best. In the tribal society, if everyone would be with everyone, conflict would be the inevitable outcome. Conflict within the tribe would eventually mean the death of the tribe and therefor the members of it. Cooperation sustains and upholds the lives of the tribal members.

Women are inclusive and men are exclusive. Just think of the western politics today… but I will write about that another day. I’m thinking of 2 other common examples in everyday life. Facebook hearts is the first. Women, and ultra-feminized weak manboys, tend to use them everywhere to everyone, even to those they despise. Masculine men are not. They are exclusively using them, if ever, to their blood and their partner.
Late night conversations is the second. Every man knows what the male “friend” wants if he’s in contact with his woman during the late hours. This is unacceptable behaviour by the woman for the masculine man of hers’. Let me be clear; many women are not even aware of this. They are only talking to a friend..! But the man knows, being a man…


To avoid unneccessary conflicts in your relationship, women should be aware of this, the way men are wired, and stop being too inclusive and receptive. Men, understand that, even though your woman is “guilty” of this, it does not neccessarily mean she’s aware of it. It’s natural for her to make everyone feel good and wanted. Rather, talk openly and, preferably, without blaming and harsh language. But be very clear. We as men knows other men right..?


Man and Wife vs Husband and Wife – the dramatic change in the roles of the sexes


There is a lot of unbalanced relations between men and women. In Sweden 50 % of all marriages ends up in divorce. There’s a lot of factors contributing to this trend, such as feminism… Oh shit, I was about to write a whole list, but I won’t. Most of the factors is linked to feminism, so I will write about that in a coming article. Today we take a look at a very interesting development in terms of language, which in its powerful way paints how our convictions on the roles of the sexes has changed dramatically. 

I know the vast majority is struggling. We are many who feels somehing is wrong. Or that it should be somewhat different. There’s an internal fight. Our urges and instincts speaks to us, but the exterior world of the society and our partner speaks different, and we succumb for the latter. This creates a lot of frustration, and imbalances between the sexes. ‘Cause you know, it all starts with the man. If he’s balanced, the woman folllows.  Ok, I will get back to this. I just wanted to share a teaser here.

Since we are a quite lost in terms of relations, identity and culture, it is very useful to look at how our ancestors used to live, and to bring back that connection to them. Many surely thinks we had a viscious patriarchy. Nothing could be further from the truth. The totally dominant and viscious man, in a relationship, is not our traditional ways, but the ways that came from the Middle East.

Our culture in Europe has changed significantly since Christianity entered the lands of ours’. We used to live in tight, homogenous tribal societies. Then the Judeo-Christian values took over. The female lost her status and everyone was to either pledge faith to the 1 god, or face the most evil punishments and death. Let’s take a look at one aspect underpinning this change in the roles of the sexes.

When we get married we must use the phrase “man and wife” sometime during the ritual in the church. Hearing the word “man”, one instantly refers to the male human being, but we do not use the word “woman”, as in “man and woman” during the actual ritual. Why is that? We take a deeper look into history.

In the original Germanic languages, the word for the male and female humans were “wer” for male and “wif” for the female. We still have this connection through Latin, where “virile” means masculine (wer). We can also see it in the concept of “werewolf” which means man-wolf, but literally “male-wolf”. It wasn’t until later we began to use the word “man” for the male. “Mann” means divine human mind. According to Tacitus, the Germanic peoples thought they were derived from the first human being whos name was Mannu. The original understanding in the Germanic world was that both males and females could be “mann”, divine human mind. This is the Indo-European heritage. The Veda states that they were derived from Manu, the first King who saved mankind and the sacred scriptural lore.
So for the priest in the Christian tradition to pronounce the couple “man and wife”, literally mean; “I now pronounce you “divine human mind and female”. This is the transition when we adopt the Christian religion, which had adopted the previous Hebrew understanding of the bible. So, it seems that the female is thought to be the servant to this divine human mind… Very unequal! Here we clearly see how we changed the way we looked at the roles of the sexes. Earlier, the female had an equal worth as the male and was highly regarded and praised by males and society as whole. The old Hebrew ways are that the wife is there to serve and obey her man.

The traditional way of looking at this is completely different. Wife, as I earlier stated, means female. Husband (an old English word) means house bound (male). (Husbonde in Swedish…) “I now pronounce you house bound male and wife.” At a first glance one could think that this is the other way around… That the male were stuck to the house, farm and family and almost “castrated”, but it is actually a sign of high social status. As a young man in the Germanic tribe, one were required to be a warrior. Being a warrior, he had to be single, to have no possesions, not to own any property, and thus required to be able to travel all around their tribal territory, defending against any enemies or to go on a raid etc. So they were soldiers. If he would have had a wife and children, property and so forth, he would be attached to these. That could be very negative if he were captured as a hostage, and the fear of loosing his life would be greater, since he had to “be there” for his wife and children. As an unattached warrior he would neither having to worry about the life and wellbeing of his loved ones, who also could be targeted to enemies. So not being attached to anything, made him totally focused on his status as a warrior. And then, after a given time in service, and being successful, he was allowed to be a “house bound”. This means he could have a property, build house and start a family. He then had other appointments, within the tribe, such as taking care of the society as a whole and voting on laws and so on. Successful in this area could mean he rised to be a chief.

Reading Tacitus and the masterpiece of Östen Kjellman and others, it is clear this was a very harmonious society, where men AND women were equally highly regarded. They were both equally important, for life, family and tribe. They lived in harmony and balance, mostly having different functions (there were female warriors also, called Shield Maidens), in between and with Nature. In this particular case it is reflected in the phrase “husband and wife”. It is completely different from the adopted Roman, Judeo-Christian mindset, where the male represented the divine powers and the female were to obey and serve him, giving him children and had virtually no value beyond this.

I would suggest the importance of taking a look at OUR ways, tradition and identity, instead of keep on these misleading tracks, of which feminism is one, where we are trying to fight the ways of the invading desert religions. It’s way more powerful, strengthening and evolving.